Introduction to Deconstruction
后现代主义者于20世纪末60年代源于法国，它是思想家皮埃尔•德希达用于抨击社会学中的存在主义者而明确提出的方法论。重构就是降解内部结构再展开创新和并购，其本质是对存在主义者的毁坏与降解，它的服务中心思想是摒弃、毁坏和反现代主义者，是后现代主义者的关键关键组成部分。
后现代主义者内部结构设计最早出现于建筑物领域，其主要特征是把完整的现代主义者、存在主义者建筑物整体碎裂处理展开并购，形成碎裂的内部空间和形态，具有物质性和主观性，是对宣德现代主义者、和平主义者准则和标准的驳斥与抨击。理查德•托德是现代著名后现代主义者建筑物师，也是“建筑物界的现代舞师”。
后现代主义者最大的特点是反服务中心、反权威性、反相互依赖对付。德希达生前对建筑物非常钟爱，视建筑物为控制社会沟通沟通交流和沟通交流的工具。后现代主义者建筑物师们认为应把许多存在的现代和现代的建筑物不利因素重新构筑，利用更加包容、自由、多元化的方式来重构捷伊建筑物方法论内部结构设计。
后现代主义者不但驳斥了现代主义者的关键关键组成部分之一的现代派，而且也对象征主义者的后现代准则如等距，人与自然，统一 明确提出了考验。但后现代主义者并非自如的内部结构设计,尽管不少后现代主义者的建筑物虽说杂乱，但他们仍然考虑内部结构不利因素的可能性和室内内部空间功能的要求。从这个意义上来说，后现代主义者不过是另一种形式的现代派。
在20世纪末西方抨击史上，后现代主义者明确提出的反神性唯物主义者( anti-logocentrism)、surfaces( differance)、右后卫(supplementarity)、互文性(intertextuality)等抨击方法论与策略，也对现代语言文学抨击有过独有的贡献。一是，它消解了长期占有人们思想洞察力的神性非西方，冲破了级别制度的相互依赖矛盾，并明确提出概念间“并无级别和服务中心，仅有差别”的观点。其三，它发现了能指间的可择、潮词和无穷surfaces的关系，充分认识到文档的发展性和互文性，为此它也强调了听众和抨击家的关键作用。
Introduction to Deconstruction
Deconstruction originated in France in the 1960s. It was put forward by the philosopher Jacques Derrida to criticize structuralism in linguistics. Deconstruction is to decompose the structure and then innovate and reorganize it. Its essence is to destroy and decompose structuralism. Its core idea is subversion, destruction and anti traditionalism, which is an important part of post-modernism.
Deconstruction design first appeared in the field of architecture, and its main feature is to reorganize the overall fragmentation of the complete modernism and structuralism architecture, forming a fragmented space and form. It has individuality and randomness, and is a negation and criticism of the principles and standards of orthodox modernism and internationalism. Frank Gehry is a famous contemporary deconstructionist architect and “choreographer in the architectural field”.
The greatest characteristic of deconstruction is the theory of anti center, anti authority and anti dualistic confrontation . Derrida himself is very interested in architecture and regards architecture as a tool to control social communication and exchange. Deconstruction architects believe that many modern and traditional architectural factors should be reconstructed, and a new architectural theoretical framework should be constructed in a more tolerant, free and diversified way.
Deconstruction not only negates constructivism, one of the important components of modernism, but also challenges classical aesthetic principles such as symmetry, harmony and unity. However, deconstruction is not a random design. Although many deconstruction buildings seem messy, they still consider the possibility of structural factors and the requirements of indoor and outdoor space functions. In this sense, deconstruction is just another form of constructivism.
In the history of western criticism in the 20th century, the anti logocentrism, differance, complementarity, intertextuality and other critical theories and strategies proposed by deconstruction have also made unique contributions to modern language and literature criticism. First, it eliminates the Logos centrism that has occupied peoples minds for a long time, breaks the hierarchical binary opposition, and puts forward the view that “there is no hierarchy and center, only difference” between concepts. Secondly, it finds the relationship of mutual reference, polysemy and infinite extension between signifiers, fully recognizes the openness and intertextuality of the text, and therefore emphasizes the important role of readers and critics.
